Thesis: Net Promoter Scores vs. Customer Satisfaction – A Comparative Study of Service Delivery Methods and NPS

DIAMOND
RATING
Senteo Rating 2.0
04/27/23
views 6199
comments0
Author:Shaun Smith, Joe Wheeler
04/27/23
views 6200
comments0
Author:Shaun Smith, Joe Wheeler
DIAMOND
RATING
Senteo Rating 2.0

Thesis: Net Promoter Scores vs. Customer Satisfaction – A Comparative Study of Service Delivery Methods and NPS
Shaun Smith & Joe Wheeler Prentice Hall, 2002
Senteo’s Review information

This book is in dissertation form and seeks to investigate how service delivery practices result in high Net Promoter Scores (NPS). Over 930 surveys containing traditional customer satisfaction and NPS questions were collected from GE Healthcare Practice Solutions customers as they implemented the Practice Management and Electronic Medical Record software products over a 20 month period.

Participants were people in positions of authority that participated in training for implementation and use of the software and were surveyed as to how likely they were to recommend GE Healthcare IT to a friend or colleague (NPS question). There were 14 questions surrounding customer satisfaction, including asking respondents how satisfied they were with their (GE) trainer overall. Service providers who were involved in training the 930 respondents were in turn surveyed about their service delivery methods using a 12 point survey. The purpose was to identify the differences in the delivery of service between employees receiving high and low scores in order to better understand how other reasons can account for the correlation between high NPS and high customer satisfaction scores. The results of the study showed that providing service-related behavior such as humor, empathy, and expectations setting related in higher NPS as compared with providing free additional services. Thus, companies should look to provide training to service employees to achieve full integration of these behaviors rather than providing free services as a way to improve NPS. It also presents challenges for service companies seeking to measure the return on or success of soft skills training.

While academic in nature, this study provides thought-provoking findings on the variables which influence the NPS, as well as flaws in measurement and over-reliance on this one variable. The findings suggest that in the services industry it is customary for clients to have an attitude of entitlement to free services should they feel that someone has failed them at some point in the implementation process. For this reason, additional free services are not valued as much as some of the soft skills of customer service in their impact on NPS. This also raises the question of the profitability of investments in improving a company’s NPS and whether these resources are in fact misdirected.

This study is based on an institutional service environment (GE Medical Imaging training) and may have limited applications in the retail setting, for which many readers will be more interested. It also is highly academic in nature and does not address other variables which impact the customer experience overall. Readers interested in applications of the NPS will find the reading tedious and will be more interested in just reading the conclusions. Despite this, the findings are of interest in the context of a more critical thinking approach to measurement of loyalty and what variables really impact it. For example, in this case giving away free services, which may be assumed to have a direct impact on customer loyalty and satisfaction, may actually result in diminishing returns.

This is a study of Field Service Engineers to investigate whether certain service behaviors led to higher Net Promoter Scores. More than 930 surveys were collected over a 20-month period in the Service Organization. The findings support a strong statistical relationship between service-related behavior and high NPS. Surprisingly, there was a weaker relationship between providing free and/or extra services and high Net Promoter Score. In this thesis, you’ll learn which four service-related behaviors significantly related to higher Net Promoter Score.

This book has mainly academic applications and suggestions for further research to validate findings. The research findings may also be of interest to commercial service providers such as GE as well as researchers seeking to better understand and refine measurements of customer loyalty such as the NPS.

Senteo Subject Category
Senteo

This book focuses on measurement of customer loyalty and testing the validity of the NPS. Thus, it is focused on measurement and information which will help understand usage of the NPS. For more information on the NPS, its applications and other measurements, readers may refer to The Ultimate Question 2.0 Loyalty Rules or CRM at the Speed of Light.

The best book reviews in your inbox!
Subscribe now and receive a special gift with your subscription.


    Leave a Reply

    Thesis: Net Promoter Scores vs. Customer Satisfaction – A Comparative Study of Service Delivery Methods and NPS
    Shaun Smith & Joe Wheeler Prentice Hall, 2002
    Have you already read this book?
    Here, are people invited to rate the book?

    How useful was this post?

    Click on a star to rate it!

    Average rating / 5. Vote count:

    No votes so far! Be the first to rate this book.

    See content on this topic

    The key goal of lifecycle management is to maximize the customer's lifespan with the bank, integrate them into everyday banking services, and increase product penetration, which will enable solving the customer's problems in the long term. In this article, we will discuss the details and practical examples that banks can use in their customer lifecycle management.
    Shannon Quilty explains how fusing the virtual and the physical spheres can enable shopping centers to benefit from digital disruption and engage their customers with enhanced experiences.
    Michael Ruckman Talks about Customer-Centric Business Models
    What is the difference between retention and loyalty, and between customer-centric and relationship-centric business models? How exactly can one monetize customer experience? Michael Ruckman answers these questions and more…
    What is Relationship-Centricity?
    This short video explains what relationship-centricity is and how it is different from customer-centricity. Follow the link to see how companies can extract value from their relationships with
    How to Build a Business That Lasts 100 Years
    Join strategist Martin Reeves as he explains how executives can apply six principles from living organisms to build resilient businesses that flourish in the face of change.
    Build a Tower, Build a Team
    Tom Wujec from Autodesk presents some surprisingly deep research into the “marshmallow problem” — a simple team-building exercise that involves dry spaghetti, one yard of tape and a marshmallow.
    What is Relationship-Centricity?
    This short video explains what relationship-centricity is and how it is different from customer-centricity. Follow the link to see how companies can extract value from their relationships with
    Driving Change in the Age of AI: Insights from Michael Ruckman Shared on the Escaping the Drift Podcast
    In a recent episode of the Escaping the Drift podcast, host John Gafford sat down with Michael Ruckman, founder and CEO of Centeo, to explore how artificial intelligence is reshaping business—and why organizational transformation must keep pace.
    Senteo Rating
    The Infinite Game
    Related Book Reviews & Education
    Organizational health is key to business success; Lencioni guides leaders in fostering a cohesive, clear, well-communicated, and reinforced working environment to achieve sustainable success.
    This book seeks to provide a framework for a successful loyalty strategy in any company. The author starts out with some definitions of loyalty, defining the “loyalty cycle’s ” five steps: identify customers, track spending, motivate behavior, reward performance, and measure results.
    The book is a detailed examination of how organizations and other structures — not only the people there — can learn and adapt to become better and more productive.
    Jim Collins and Morten Hansen build on Colins’ previous works. They use a similar format of case studies and analyzed research to identify drivers of success in “great” companies.